Bitcoiners Are Not Utopians

Its about Responsibility.Bitcoin is RgU Tech, or in other words, “Responsibility go Up” technology.To be a Bitcoiner is to be an individual who can balance flexibility and obligation, rooted in a line of in agreement and constant values that are as closely representative of natural law as possible.This idea that Bitcoin is some wonderful panacea to all the ailments of the world or that it is some sort of utopian ideal is entirely false.Utopianism is a statist or collectivist suitable in which people are arrogant enough to believe the definition of perfection (a) exists, and (b) can be used throughout all of society and its individual participants as if theyre just numbers on a spreadsheet, i.e, they totally disregard the differences and subtleties present in all humans.Bitcoiners, at least those worth their salt, hate this notion of a utopia.True Bitcoiners are realists, and I hope this brief first-principles primer on their worths and the idea of structuring society around responsible people will set the record straight.I will draw upon an interaction on Twitter with somebody in 2020 who asked some questions that Im sure many others have too.Lets start with this comment about masks.Unfortunately, our good friend here is a bit confused about how Western societies work.What really propelled Western society was the concept that the individual is sovereign and responsible sufficient to make a choice on their own behalf, due to the fact that he was most able to know what was finest for him.This is really echoed in Eastern teachings such as the Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu, which was regrettably forced out of and censored in China thanks in big part to the more collectivist and power-oriented viewpoint of the confucianists.Gru is right in one sense: this is no longer how “Western society” works, which is a huge part of why it is decaying. This decay is rooted in the rapid rise– especially over the previous 200 years– of collectivism in the kind of the “public” society, alongside the disintegration of personal residential or commercial property and the individual.What were seeing around the world now is the peak of this foolish experiment, where: Imaginary “groups” take precedence over the genuine individual.Rights and entitlements proliferate.Responsibilities are shrugged off or ignored.Socially built ideologies supersede evolutionary or biological facts.So yeah, he may be right that its not how Western society works any longer, but it for damn sure deviates from the initial premise.Next … I disagree with this notion of it being a theoretical concept incompatible with reality.Its in fact the concept thats most suitable with reality, and without it America would not have actually gone from a freshly colonized land to the center of innovation and consequently the biggest economic power in the world within a century– and long prior to the statists or federalists took over.What made America terrific was the absence of main federal government, the frontiersmans spirit and the laissez-faire market in which innovation, excellent concepts and technology drove development forward.The initial libertarian concepts of America can still be discovered in the American Constitution, and the inertia they gave that part of the world has continued to give it an edge, despite all the damage done by the “democratic republic” and the collectivists over the previous 200 years.Why we deviated from that is a topic of a much larger discussion, which people like Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Murray Rothbard, Ayn Rand or William Davidson and James Dale Rees-Mogg talk about in their books.The brief version in my restricted space here is that the introduction of commercial innovation and advantages of centralization at scale ensured the public device understood as “the state” was the most effective way of accumulating and taking power, specifically with the risk of mass violence.The most violent leaders were able to form monopolies, “voted in by the people,” and ever since, mankind has been living through a unusual and evolutionarily deviant experiment where all systems, procedures, natural environments, lifestyles, diet plans, information and opinions are being homogenized, standardized, sanitized and made as devoid of any difference as possible in order to cater to the least expensive common denominator of bipedal humanoid.The goal is sameness, so theyve made everything fluid, relative and mutable. Sure, somebody else can pick to assist them, willingly speaking, or they may try to “force” somebody to give them alms, but neither of these acts are systemic forms of theft and socialization– as we have with democracy or the contemporary state.This is the only method the people in a society can fix course and enhance. The option is to continue deteriorating personal agency and the individuals capacity to believe or act for themselves.This is the course to dependence and the welfare or communist state, where the incentive to be a productive member of society continues to reduce, while the expectation that somebody else will give you something for absolutely nothing– since of your “requirements”– continues to increase.Again– this sort of society fails, and luckily (for us at least) weve had a possibility to see proof of this hundreds of times this century. Madness.In any case, this private then sent me a weird reply: I dont understand how he got there, however I attempted to clarify: Consequences are the natural corrective system of life!And because the person is the atomic (and just genuine) constituent of a society, they can not remedy themselves if they are oblivious to the consequences of their actions, or if those repercussions are borne by another specific or group.I can not go to the gym for you, nor should I pass away if you leap off a cliff!There is no resistance to consequences in the genuine world!

Its about Responsibility.Bitcoin is RgU Tech, or in other words, “Responsibility go Up” technology.To be a Bitcoiner is to be a person who can balance flexibility and duty, rooted in a line of congruent and consistent worths that are as closely representative of natural law as possible.This concept that Bitcoin is some magical remedy to all the disorders of the world or that it is some sort of utopian perfect is entirely false.Utopianism is a statist or collectivist suitable in which individuals are big-headed sufficient to believe the definition of perfection (a) exists, and (b) can be applied throughout all of society and its specific participants as if theyre just numbers on a spreadsheet, i.e, they totally disregard the distinctions and nuances present in all humans.Bitcoiners, at least those worth their salt, hate this concept of a utopia.True Bitcoiners are realists, and I hope this brief first-principles primer on their worths and the idea of structuring society around responsible individuals will set the record straight.I will draw upon an interaction on Twitter with someone in 2020 who asked some questions that Im sure many others have too.Lets start with this remark about masks.Unfortunately, our good friend here is a bit confused about how Western societies work.What actually moved Western society was the idea that the individual is sovereign and accountable sufficient to make a choice on their own behalf, since he was most able to know what was best for him.This is in fact echoed in Eastern mentors such as the Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu, which was sadly required out of and censored in China thanks in large part to the more collectivist and power-oriented viewpoint of the confucianists.Gru is right in one sense: this is no longer how “Western society” works, which is a huge part of why it is decomposing. This decay is rooted in the quick increase– especially over the previous 200 years– of collectivism in the form of the “public” society, along with the disintegration of personal property and the individual.What were seeing around the world now is the peak of this foolish experiment, where: Imaginary “groups” take precedence over the genuine individual.Rights and privileges proliferate.Responsibilities are shrugged off or ignored.Socially built ideologies supersede biological or evolutionary facts.So yeah, he might be ideal that its not how Western society works any longer, but it for damn sure deviates from the initial premise.Next … I disagree with this idea of it being a theoretical concept incompatible with reality.Its in fact the concept thats most compatible with truth, and without it America would not have actually gone from a recently colonized land to the center of innovation and subsequently the biggest economic power in the world within a century– and long before the statists or federalists took over.What made America terrific was the absence of main government, the frontiersmans spirit and the laissez-faire market in which development, great ideas and innovation drove progress forward.The initial libertarian concepts of America can still be found in the American Constitution, and the inertia they provided that part of the world has actually continued to give it an edge, in spite of all the damage done by the “democratic republic” and the collectivists over the previous 200 years.Why we deviated from that is a subject of a much bigger conversation, which individuals like Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Murray Rothbard, Ayn Rand or William Davidson and James Dale Rees-Mogg go over in their books.The brief version in my minimal area here is that the arrival of commercial technology and benefits of centralization at scale ensured the public apparatus understood as “the state” was the most efficient way of accruing and taking power, specifically with the risk of mass violence.The most violent leaders were able to form monopolies, “voted in by the individuals,” and ever because, humanity has been living through an evolutionarily deviant and unusual experiment where all systems, procedures, natural environments, way of lives, diets, details and viewpoints are being homogenized, standardized, sanitized and made as devoid of any variance as possible in order to cater to the most affordable typical denominator of bipedal humanoid.The objective is sameness, so theyve made whatever fluid, relative and mutable. The alternative is to continue eroding individual firm and the individuals capacity to believe or act for themselves.This is the path to reliance and the welfare or communist state, where the incentive to be an efficient member of society continues to decrease, while the expectation that somebody else will provide you something for absolutely nothing– since of your “needs”– continues to increase.Again– this sort of society stops working, and luckily (for us at least) weve had a possibility to see proof of this hundreds of times this century.