Jump Trading seeks to move Terra class-action lawsuit to California

Algorithmic and high-frequency trading company Jump Trading is seeking to have the class-action lawsuit against the firm moved from Illinois to a court in northern California, arguing that it would significantly accelerate legal procedures. The lawsuit was initially filed on May 9 by Taewoo Kim, separately and on behalf of others affected by the collapse of the Terra/Luna environment. Kim is represented by Selendy Gay and Robbins Geller Rudman & & Dowd LLP.Jump Trading embroiled in controversy as suit claims it controlled TerraUSDs worth. Accusations of breaking regulations and unjust enrichment put the company under the legal microscope.– Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) May 14, 2023

The match declares that Jump Trading and its CEO, Kanav Kariya, were associated with a cost adjustment plan connected to the infamous TerraUSD stablecoin, which allegedly resulted in $1.3 billion worth of revenue for the business. Additionally, the company and Kariya were implicated of breaching Commodity Exchange and Commodity Futures Trading Commission policies and of typical law unjust enrichment.In the most recent motion, submitted on June 9, the accuseds argued that the choice to submit the match in Illinois was an “effort at forum shopping,” as the primary complainant is a New Jersey-based resident represented by law office from New York and California. The term “online forum shopping” describes the practice of picking courts or jurisdictions that allegedly have the most favorable rules or laws that support the position of the plaintiff.Excerpt from motion to transfer location. Source: CourtListener” There is no lawfully compelling connection to Illinois, and almost all of the pertinent witnesses and files either are located outside Illinois or are just as quickly accessed elsewhere,” the court doc reads.The offenders added that the plaintiffs also have a simultaneous and appropriate suit that has actually been ongoing in California for over a year, and as such, both cases ought to be combined or coordinated.Related: Binance.US works with former SEC enforcement official amidst lawsuit: Report” This case is not the first– or even second or third– to be submitted on these realities. Rather, numerous lead complainants have been prosecuting these precise same occasions for nearly a year in the Northern District of California in Patterson v. Terraform Labs, Pte. Ltd.,” the offenders argued, adding: “This case needs to be transferred to the Northern District of California for consolidation or coordination with Patterson. […] This action is most likely to move faster in the Northern District of California, which has a year head start.” Cointelegraph has reached out to the plaintiffs for comment, and will upgrade the post if they react. The TerraUSD/LUNA task collapsed in May 2022, wiping billions of dollars from the market. The tasks founder Do Kwon was detained in Montenegro in March for presumably using incorrect travel documents. He is potentially on the hook to serve prison time in both the U.S. and South Korea. Korean media reports that for several years, Do Kwon had actually privately been sponsoring a prominent Montenegrin politician using unlawful funds. Two days earlier, a Montenegro high court approved Do Kwons bail request once again, permitting his release from jail. https://t.co/aNqYkKG70H— FatMan (@FatManTerra) June 9, 2023

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other threats loom

Algorithmic and high-frequency trading firm Jump Trading is looking for to have the class-action lawsuit against the company moved from Illinois to a court in northern California, arguing that it would significantly speed up legal proceedings. The suit was initially filed on May 9 by Taewoo Kim, separately and on behalf of others impacted by the collapse of the Terra/Luna environment. The suit alleges that Jump Trading and its CEO, Kanav Kariya, were included in a price manipulation scheme connected to the infamous TerraUSD stablecoin, which presumably resulted in $1.3 billion worth of earnings for the company. Source: CourtListener” There is no legally engaging connection to Illinois, and almost all of the pertinent witnesses and documents either are located outside Illinois or are just as easily accessed in other places,” the court doc reads.The defendants added that the plaintiffs also have a synchronised and pertinent suit that has been ongoing in California for over a year, and as such, both cases should be consolidated or coordinated.Related: Binance.US works with previous SEC enforcement official in the middle of suit: Report” This case is not the very first– or even second or third– to be submitted on these realities.