Progressives Misunderstand Bitcoin Because They’ve Lost Their Way

In the very same way that Republicans have actually wandered from conservatism and Democrats have drifted from liberalism, Progressives have wandered from progressivism.Whereas no one anticipates Republicans or Democrats to always run with an uncorrupted philosophical coherence and/or moral consistency, I believe there are numerous who do sort of anticipate Progressives to act in that manner. Sometimes it does, but it is definitely not true that Progressives are inherently or inevitably prototypes of progressive ideas.If we believe about all of the ingenious, ingenious and yes, progressive methods in which Bitcoin can be utilized as a tool to deal with problems like the environment, wealth inequality, equivalent financial gain access to and basic human flexibility, we may question why Progressives arent heartily backing its development and use. One way of accounting for this seeming dissonance is just that Progressives are not always the apotheosis of progressive ideas.In fact, contrary to common belief, Progressives do not have a reliable, epistemic monopoly on what is or is not progressive. You do not have to identify yourself as a Progressive to believe in and advocate for progressive ideas. Approval or endorsement (or the absence thereof) from Progressives does not alter this.To conclude, I think when we ask why Progressives dont appear to take to Bitcoin– an innovation that is inarguably pretty lowercase “p” progressive– we are presupposing that Progressives will constantly back progressive concepts.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Sometimes it does, however it is certainly not true that Progressives are inherently or inevitably prototypes of progressive ideas.If we think about all of the innovative, ingenious and yes, progressive ways in which Bitcoin can be used as a tool to deal with concerns like the climate, wealth inequality, equal financial access and general human liberty, we may wonder why Progressives arent heartily backing its growth and usage. One method of accounting for this seeming dissonance is merely that Progressives are not always the paragons of progressive ideas.In reality, contrary to typical belief, Progressives do not have a reliable, epistemic monopoly on what is or is not progressive. Approval or recommendation (or the absence thereof) from Progressives does not change this.To conclude, I believe when we ask why Progressives dont appear to take to Bitcoin– an innovation that is inarguably quite lowercase “p” progressive– we are presupposing that Progressives will always back progressive ideas.