SEC’s Gensler claims ‘parallels’ between Binance and FTX, yet one wasn’t sued
On The Other Hand, Markus Thielen, the head of research study and strategy at Matrixport and author of Crypto Titans, used a various point of view. Speaking with Cointelegraph, he discussed that prior to FTX, crypto was not viewed as a significant threat to U.S. financial stability. The fall of 3 significant banks this year has shown otherwise, he said. “It wasnt a concern to repair or stop the crypto rails at first,” stated Thielen. “People recognized that after FTX, its actually billions of dollars.” Thielen also thinks theres a notion of “humiliation” for those that did not predict the problems at FTX, consisting of lawmakers.Related: Binance. United States states user funds stay safe amid SEC attempt to freeze properties” You can make an argument that those individuals feel a little bit ashamed and for that reason they have to work double tough to truly distance themselves from it.” It needs to be kept in mind that while the SEC has not announced a suit versus the FTX exchange itself, the regulator has laid charges against its founders and previous executives.These consist of former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, previous Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, previous FTX co-founder Gary Wang and former FTX Director of Engineering Nishad Singh.Cointelegraph got in touch with the SEC for remark however did not receive an immediate action. Magazine: Bitcoin is on a clash with Net Zero guarantees
The United States securities chair has hinted at “parallels” between crypto exchange Binance and collapsed exchange FTX– namely their alleged usage of sis firms to move funds. Speaking to Bloomberg on June 6, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler pointed to FTXs supposed fraud and manipulation regarding its sibling firm Alameda Research, including the declared role that its creator Sam Bankman-Fried played in it. SECs Gary Gensler consulting with Bloombergs David Westin. Source: Bloomberg” Theres a service model that bundles and commingles functions that we do not see, nor would we allow elsewhere, in financing,” he stated. On June 5, the SEC filed a complaint against Binance pressing a total of 13 charges. One of the accusations in the match claims that funds from Binance and Binance.US were combined into an account managed by the Changpeng Zhao-associated Merit Peak Limited.Another accusation claims that Binance.US took part in wash trading through its “main concealed market making trading company Sigma Chain,” which is owned by Zhao.” Platform after platform, business owners […] are attempting to construct wealth for themselves and their investors through sis organizations– hedge funds– trading against the consumers,” stated Gensler. Wheres the FTX lawsuit?The current interview is most likely to add more fuel to the continuous argument on Twitter– why hasnt the SEC sued FTX? They didnt take legal action against FTX. https://t.co/FVgi5l6VcI— CZ Binance (@cz_binance) June 6, 2023
In a June 6 tweet, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse stated the most recent string of lawsuits is an effort by the SEC to “distract” from the companys “FTX debacle.” Others recommended that FTXs sizeable donations toward political parties and Bankman-Frieds regular lobbying in Washington D.C. in the past could also be an element. Why didnt the SEC take legal action against FTX?Oh thats right they enabled public servants to take * donations * and conspired with them to more oppress Americans https://t.co/EgKhB99e46— Wendy O (@CryptoWendyO) June 6, 2023
Wheres the FTX lawsuit?The recent interview is most likely to add more fuel to the continuous argument on Twitter– why hasnt the SEC sued FTX? In a June 6 tweet, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse stated the most current string of suits is an effort by the SEC to “distract” from the companys “FTX fiasco.” Thielen also believes theres a notion of “humiliation” for those that did not predict the concerns at FTX, including lawmakers.Related: Binance.” It needs to be noted that while the SEC has actually not revealed a claim against the FTX exchange itself, the regulator has actually laid charges against its creators and former executives.These consist of previous FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, former FTX co-founder Gary Wang and former FTX Director of Engineering Nishad Singh.Cointelegraph contacted the SEC for comment however did not get an immediate reaction.
Related Content
Other Questions People Ask
What are SEC’s Gensler claims about the parallels between Binance and FTX?
SEC Chair Gary Gensler has highlighted similarities between Binance and the collapsed FTX exchange, particularly regarding their alleged use of sister firms to manage funds. He pointed out that both platforms may have engaged in practices that blur the lines of transparency and regulatory compliance. Gensler's comments suggest a concern that these business models could pose risks to investors and the broader financial system.
Why hasn’t the SEC sued FTX despite Gensler’s claims of parallels with Binance?
The SEC has not initiated a lawsuit against FTX itself, focusing instead on charges against its founders and executives. This has led to speculation about the reasons behind the lack of action against FTX, with some suggesting that political donations and lobbying efforts by FTX's former CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried, may have influenced the SEC's decisions. The absence of a lawsuit has sparked debates within the crypto community regarding regulatory fairness and accountability.
What implications do Gensler’s statements have for Binance and its users?
Gensler's remarks about Binance and its alleged practices could have significant implications for the exchange and its users. If the SEC pursues further legal action based on these claims, it could lead to increased scrutiny and regulatory changes affecting how Binance operates. Users may need to be cautious about their investments and stay informed about potential risks associated with the platform.
How do experts view the SEC’s approach to Binance compared to FTX?
Experts like Markus Thielen have expressed concerns about the SEC's approach, noting a sense of "humiliation" among lawmakers who failed to foresee the issues at FTX. Thielen suggests that this sentiment may drive regulators to act more aggressively against Binance as they seek to distance themselves from past oversights. This dynamic raises questions about the consistency and motivations behind regulatory actions in the crypto space.
What are the potential consequences of Gensler’s comments for future crypto regulation?
Gensler’s comments may signal a shift in how regulators approach cryptocurrency exchanges, potentially leading to stricter regulations. By drawing parallels between Binance and FTX, he underscores the need for greater oversight in the industry. This could result in more comprehensive regulations aimed at protecting investors and ensuring market integrity, which may impact how crypto businesses operate moving forward.